Katrina
We have been shocked by scenes of devastation in New Orleans and the Gulf coast. Our hearts go out to the victims. In our climate protection community, there has been a debate about the extent to which global warming played a part in the intensity of Katrina, and the attendant level of destruction. We have looked into the changing science of hurricanes generally, and the growing recognition that climate change may be playing a role in the intensity of tropical storms. However, the science is complex, and it is difficult to say what part global warming actually has in the intensity of any given storm.
Here is a statement that I believe expresses the essence of the scientific opinion on hurricanes and global warming:
In evaluating all tropical storms, globally, the (average?) storm energy has increased over the past 30 years. There is a correlation between increase in the energy of the storms, and the increase in tropical sea surface temperature. It is likely that global warming is causing the increase in sea surface temperature. Therefore, there is a finite probability that the effects of global warming had some effect on the energy in Katrina. However, this probability, and the amount of contribution of global warming to any individual storm, can’t be known. It is not possible even to know whether the contribution is small or large. It is likely that other influences, such as the well-known multi-decadal North Atlantic climate cycles, are more of a factor in the increase in Atlantic tropical storm intensity over the past ten years. Over longer periods of time, into the future, the influence of global warming will become more of a factor in the intensity of storms, if current trends continue.
Here is a link to a good discussion of hurricanes and global warming on Real Climate:

Recent Comments